The topic
in which I will be arguing is the quality of the environment of education for
students that live in a high-income area compared to those that live in lower-income
areas. From my observations, the quality of education in facilities, resources,
transportation, quality of education, and more is clearly higher quality in areas
of higher-income. It is evident that students in lower-income areas are not
nearly as developed socially, mentally, and educationally compared to those
that are surrounded by all of the resources they could possibly need in high-income
areas. I am calling for the funding of schools in both high-income areas and
low-income areas to be equal so that children everywhere have an equal chance
at a bright future starting from a young age. The reason I am calling for this
action is because this funding will go into paying teachers who actually have
degrees. Too many teachers in low-income schools do not have teaching degrees.
Rather, they either gotten certified through alternative programs or have a
degree in something completely different. The funding of low-income schools
will not only get qualified teachers teaching in schools, but it will allow for
the children in those schools to get a better education. The families in low-income
schools and school districts struggle to provide students with the basic needs
for school such as backpacks, pencils, folders, notebooks, and lunch. This is
why schools have started to implement the free and reduced lunch programs for
students who cannot afford the lunch provided. This can result in a problem for
schools because if they decide to put money into providing students with lunch,
then they will have to either cut back on the salaries of teachers, cut
teachers which increases class sizes greatly, or stop providing supplies to students
who can’t pay for them. These are issues that are not seen in high-income
districts because even though practically all high-income schools and school
districts offer a free and reduced lunch, it is utilized by very few students.
These high-income schools that usually have many donors, or require a tuition
will not have a problem with the cost of things like books or backpacks. This
can have a large influence on test scores due to the fact that in low-income
schools, the students’ full potential is not being brought out due to the lack
of resources and teacher quality. In contrast, the test scores in high-income
schools sky rocket past the scores of the lower-income schools because the
students have access to all of the resources and quality of teaching to foster
their education. The differences that are seen by the result of funding within
schools and school districts in high-income areas compared to low-income areas
need to be addressed and changed so that every child has an equal opportunity
to show their full potential.
Alright, I hear you on this. This'll be a very numbers-heavy argument, looking at budgets and performance statistics, which means your approach might need to look into how you can turn a wall of numbers into a viable story for your audience. Likewise, you're asking for a spending increase--if you're trying to move voters as your audience, you're going to have to overcome a very serious wariness to things that imply tax increases.
ReplyDelete